<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Easy Image Protection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brainhandles.com/2007/04/30/easy-image-protection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brainhandles.com/2007/04/30/easy-image-protection/</link>
	<description>Whatever's tugging at my brain handles</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 02:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jade</title>
		<link>http://www.brainhandles.com/2007/04/30/easy-image-protection/#comment-6930</link>
		<dc:creator>Jade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brainhandles.com/2007/04/30/easy-image-protection/#comment-6930</guid>
		<description>In addition to this precaution, I also use a water mark. So if the image stealer does use the source code method and uses the URL to upload the image to the Photobucket or something similar, the water mark will still be there. Water marks are also extremely difficult to remove. 

Great post! More webmasters need to know about this sort of thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to this precaution, I also use a water mark. So if the image stealer does use the source code method and uses the URL to upload the image to the Photobucket or something similar, the water mark will still be there. Water marks are also extremely difficult to remove. </p>
<p>Great post! More webmasters need to know about this sort of thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
