<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And Still More AdSense Craziness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brainhandles.com/2007/10/26/and-still-more-adsense-craziness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brainhandles.com/2007/10/26/and-still-more-adsense-craziness/</link>
	<description>Whatever's tugging at my brain handles</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg Bulmash</title>
		<link>http://www.brainhandles.com/2007/10/26/and-still-more-adsense-craziness/#comment-1719</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Bulmash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 02:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brainhandles.com/2007/10/26/and-still-more-adsense-craziness/#comment-1719</guid>
		<description>@joost

Always so quick to mention lawyers???  This is my fourth post on the topic and the first to mention lawyers in any way whatsoever.  So are you always so quick to make baseless accusations?

Google may be telling the truth that the numbers are in no way off, but the way they generally ignore the cries of webmasters for more information engenders distrust and anger.

You don't actually need a strong case to sue.  You just need to be pissed off enough to sue.  And the longer this drags on with Google being tight-lipped and secretive, the closer people get to being that pissed off.  I'm trying to get that into Google's heads, so if they can't fix this faster, they can at least start handling it better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@joost</p>
<p>Always so quick to mention lawyers???  This is my fourth post on the topic and the first to mention lawyers in any way whatsoever.  So are you always so quick to make baseless accusations?</p>
<p>Google may be telling the truth that the numbers are in no way off, but the way they generally ignore the cries of webmasters for more information engenders distrust and anger.</p>
<p>You don't actually need a strong case to sue.  You just need to be pissed off enough to sue.  And the longer this drags on with Google being tight-lipped and secretive, the closer people get to being that pissed off.  I'm trying to get that into Google's heads, so if they can't fix this faster, they can at least start handling it better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joost</title>
		<link>http://www.brainhandles.com/2007/10/26/and-still-more-adsense-craziness/#comment-1717</link>
		<dc:creator>joost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 00:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brainhandles.com/2007/10/26/and-still-more-adsense-craziness/#comment-1717</guid>
		<description>Always so quick to mention lawyers. You said yourself overall numbers look fine. How about taking a breath and cutting a little slack?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always so quick to mention lawyers. You said yourself overall numbers look fine. How about taking a breath and cutting a little slack?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
